On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> 'Desktop' is in contrast to 'server'. On a server, you only reboot to >> load a new kernel and you never use the console display, rarely change > > Oh, I dunno - it's not infrequently that I have to plug in a > monitor-on-a-stick.... You only need that for installs or if you've done something wrong. And then it isn't really a 'display'/GUI as much as a text based tty emulator. >> the drive layout or use removable storage, and almost never change the >> network connections - and you expect the same programs to run for >> years. On a desktop, the display is the first priority, ownership of >> certain devices is expected to magically shift to the user at the >> console, developers will give up consistent device naming for boot >> speed, and nobody cares if last year's programs still run with this >> year's OS. > > I don't agree with that. Some people do want to keep running what they > know, and if the budget's tight.... Then you probably don't run Fedora - the 'desktop' oriented distribution, or care much for the non-backwards compatible changes that went from there to RHEL. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos