Re: Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> CentOS is what it is: as close as possible to upstream EL without being upstream EL.  Nothing more, nothing less, and bug-for-bug compatible.  If that's not what you need, then CentOS won't meet your need.

Yes, but that 'possible' part is the problem.  How much reason do you
have to think that it will continue to be possible to be anywhere
close to upstream?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux