Re: redhat vs centos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:42 AM, John Beranek <john@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 02/11/2011 10:31, Patrick Lists wrote:
>> > On 11/02/2011 11:02 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
>> >> What is a "socket" in their pricing model? The word can mean so many
>> >> different things...
>> >
>> > Afaik it refers to a physical cpu socket. So they count actual cpu's,
>> > not the amount of cores in each cpu.
>>
> The sockets refers to the literal, physical CPUs.  Virtual CPUs (for
> guests) or cores do not count.  Unless your running some kind of mainframe
> you will likely have a server with anywhere from 1-2 sockets.  My
> understanding of the licensing is that you pay for the
> host/hypervisor/machine to have RHEL, plus however many guests the license
> includes.  So 4 or unlimited.
<snip>
Heh. Depends on where you work: we've been getting in servers with 4, like
the Dell PE 810, and some Penguins we've got, and I think the new ones
(haven't opened any up) have more.

        mark

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux