Re: redhat vs centos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 11/02/2011 06:33 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 November 2011 22:55:39 Ian Pilcher wrote:
>> On 11/02/2011 09:35 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>>> There is the Oracle "unbreakable" Linux (or whatever they call it),
>>> which is a RHEL clone. The recent RH packaging changes are aimed
>>> squarely at that distro from what I understand. The problem is that
>>> the changes affect *all* clones the same way, including CentOS.
>>
>> To what changes are you referring?
>>
> 
> Umm, the new AUP?
> 

OK.  I was thinking that "packaging changes" meant something else.

Thanks!

-- 
========================================================================
Ian Pilcher                                         arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx
"If you're going to shift my paradigm ... at least buy me dinner first."
========================================================================

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux