Re: redhat vs centos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Vreme: 11/02/2011 08:19 PM, Marcio Carneiro piše:
> OpenIndiana.org
>
> 2011/11/2 Lamar Owen<lowen@xxxxxxxx>
>
>> On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 01:46:57 AM Bob Hoffman wrote:
>>> Personally I am thinking of staying away from all red hat clones due to
>>> redhat's actions for my own security.
>>> The only thing on the horizon I see is ubuntu server as best supported
>>> and up to date.
>>
>> There are really two good enterprise-grade alternatives, in my opinion,
>> one free and one not:
>> 1.) SuSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES);
>> 2.) Debian Stable.
>>
>> I've had some issues with Ubuntu LTS in the past; perhaps they've worked
>> those out, but since they're somewhat based off of Debian, why not go to
>> the source if you're going to go 'Debian-like?'

Marcio, please do not top post, the norm on this mailing list is to 
write bellow the original poster. Thanks.

-- 

Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
trusty Spiderman...
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux