Re: redhat vs centos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, Nov 02, 2011, Lamar Owen wrote:
>On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 01:46:57 AM Bob Hoffman wrote:
>> Personally I am thinking of staying away from all red hat clones due to 
>> redhat's actions for my own security.
>> The only thing on the horizon I see is ubuntu server as best supported 
>> and up to date.
>
>There are really two good enterprise-grade alternatives, in my opinion, one free and one not:
>1.) SuSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES);

We were using that about 5 years ago, and paid Novell a fair amount of
money in their Partner program.  Novell's support was slim to non-existent
leading to our move to CentOS.

Given the recent sale to Attachmate and such, I wouldn't invest any time or
money in SLES.

Bill
-- 
INTERNET:   bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
URL: http://www.celestial.com/  PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
Voice:          (206) 236-1676  Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820
Fax:            (206) 232-9186  Skype: jwccsllc (206) 855-5792

In general, the art of government consists of taking as much money as
possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other.
 -- Voltaire (1764)
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux