On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 10:52:36AM -0400, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Dotan Cohen wrote:
> I also really dislike their equivalent of grub.conf - it's a long, long
> script, with stuff buried in it, and it calls a bunch of other files,
> rather than the simple, clean one in RH/CentOS.
Yes, it's grub2. Welcome to the new Fedora world. Next RH version will
almost certainly have it. I have a page about it for Fedora
users.
http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu/grub2.html, that covers
minor modifications in Fedora, because with the advent of Fedora 16, it
became the default. (On the other hand, most of what is on the web right
now is for Ubuntu, which has been using it for awhile.)
Most of the differences I see are pretty minor--not good or bad, per se,
just different, such as using update-rc as something similar to
chkconfig, editing /etc/network/interfaces (I think), rather than
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts, and so on.
Judging from job postings in the NYC area, though, RH/CentOS are still
pretty much dominant.
--
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
