Re: What happened to 6.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> No clone distros, including CentOS and Scientific Linux, are perfect.
> If someone asks which of the two has a better binary compatibility, I
> would answer, "they are equally good".

One of the 'selling points' as a big reason to use open source is that
you can fix problems or add features on your own by rebuilding from
source.  If, in fact, you cannot rebuild a src rpm and get a working
copy then in that respect you might as well be using closed,
proprietary software.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux