Re: What happened to 6.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Vreme: 10/29/2011 05:36 PM, Les Mikesell piše:
> Also, there is probably room for a public, if not legal, complaint
> about gpl compliance if the source and binary components they
> distribute don't match in a way that you can rebuild a binary that
> works the same.   Of course there is a lot of non-gpl content, so even
> strictly observing the GPL rules won't solve the whole problem.

Less, please do not steer-up trouble.

If you want to fight Red Hat create your own RHEL clone and then try to 
enact those rights you are asking about.

Better option is to have CentOS as it is, and they create forks with 
specific enhancements by adding GPL versions from Fedora or other 
places, or by using third party repositories consisting of best 
developers (to ensure stable systems).

Fighting windmills was done by Don Quixote and many small countries 
against certain political and military powers. And nothing good came out 
of it. As one of the my folks sayings go: Bull without horns can not 
fight with bull with horns... Not successfully at least.


-- 

Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
trusty Spiderman...
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux