Re: ssd quandry

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Maybe try to partition it to see what happens.



On 10/23/2011 12:07 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On a CentOS 6 64bit system, I added a couple prototype SAS SSDs on a HP
> P411 raid controller (I believe this is a rebranded LSI megaraid with HP
> firmware) and am trying to format them for best random IO performance
> with something like postgresql.
>
> so, I used the raid command tool to build a raid0 with 2 SAS SSDs
>
> # hpacucli ctrl slot=1 logicaldrive 3 show detail
>
> Smart Array P410 in Slot 1
>
>      array C
>
>         Logical Drive: 3
>            Size: 186.3 GB
>            Fault Tolerance: RAID 0
>            Heads: 255
>            Sectors Per Track: 32
>            Cylinders: 47869
>            Strip Size: 256 KB
>            Status: OK
>            Array Accelerator: Enabled
>            Unique Identifier: 600508B1001C2EDB6026F9ADF9F88A09
>            Disk Name: /dev/sdc
>            Mount Points: /ssd 186.3 GB
>            Logical Drive Label: AF36B716PACCRCN810E1R9J646A
>
> # hpacucli ctrl slot=1 show config
>
> Smart Array P410 in Slot 1                (sn: PACCRCN810E1R9J)
> ....
>      array C (Solid State SAS, Unused Space: 0 MB)
>
>
>         logicaldrive 3 (186.3 GB, RAID 0, OK)
>
>         physicaldrive 1I:1:23 (port 1I:box 1:bay 23, Solid State SAS, 100
> GB, OK)
>         physicaldrive 1I:1:24 (port 1I:box 1:bay 24, Solid State SAS, 100
> GB, OK)
>
> # hpacucli ctrl slot=1 show ssdinfo detail
>
> Smart Array P410 in Slot 1
>      Total Solid State Drives with Wearout Status: 0
>      Total Smart Array Solid State Drives: 2
>      Total Solid State SAS Drives: 2
>      Total Solid State Drives: 2
>
>
>      array C
>
>         physicaldrive 1I:1:23
>            Port: 1I
>            Box: 1
>            Bay: 23
>            Status: OK
>            Drive Type: Data Drive
>            Interface Type: Solid State SAS
>            Size: 100 GB
>            Firmware Revision: 1234
>            Serial Number: 999999999999999999
>            Model: XYZZY M2011
>            Current Temperature (C): 30
>            Maximum Temperature (C): 37
>            SSD Smart Trip Wearout: Not Supported
>            PHY Count: 2
>            PHY Transfer Rate: 6.0GBPS, Unknown
>
>         physicaldrive 1I:1:24
>            Port: 1I
>            Box: 1
>            Bay: 24
>            Status: OK
>            Drive Type: Data Drive
>            Interface Type: Solid State SAS
>            Size: 100 GB
>            Firmware Revision: 1234
>            Serial Number: 999999999999999999
>            Model: XYZZY M2011
>            Current Temperature (C): 29
>            Maximum Temperature (C): 36
>            SSD Smart Trip Wearout: Not Supported
>            PHY Count: 2
>            PHY Transfer Rate: 6.0GBPS, Unknown
>
>
>
> # tail /var/log/messages
> Oct 22 22:56:24 svfis-dl180b kernel: sd 0:0:0:3: Attached scsi generic
> sg3 type 0
> Oct 22 22:56:24 svfis-dl180b kernel: sd 0:0:0:3: [sdc] 390611040
> 512-byte logical blocks: (199 GB/186 GiB)
> Oct 22 22:56:24 svfis-dl180b kernel: sd 0:0:0:3: [sdc] 8192-byte
> physical blocks
> Oct 22 22:56:24 svfis-dl180b kernel: sd 0:0:0:3: [sdc] Write Protect is off
> Oct 22 22:56:24 svfis-dl180b kernel: sd 0:0:0:3: [sdc] Write cache:
> disabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
> Oct 22 22:56:24 svfis-dl180b kernel: sdc: unknown partition table
> Oct 22 22:56:24 svfis-dl180b kernel: sd 0:0:0:3: [sdc] Attached SCSI disk
> Oct 22 22:56:36 svfis-dl180b cmaeventd[2540]: Logical drive 3 of Array
> Controller in slot 1, has changed from status Unconfigured to OK
>
> # mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdc
> mke2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
> /dev/sdc is entire device, not just one partition!
> Proceed anyway? (y,n) y
> Filesystem label=
> OS type: Linux
> Block size=8192 (log=3)
> Fragment size=8192 (log=3)
> Stride=1 blocks, Stripe width=0 blocks
> 12210528 inodes, 24413190 blocks
> 1220659 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
> First data block=0
> Maximum filesystem blocks=4311218176
> 373 block groups
> 65528 blocks per group, 65528 fragments per group
> 32736 inodes per group
> Superblock backups stored on blocks:
>           65528, 196584, 327640, 458696, 589752, 1638200, 1769256, 3210872,
>           5307768, 8191000, 15923304, 22476104
>
> Writing inode tables: done
> Creating journal (32768 blocks): done
> Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done
>
>
> # mount -t ext4 /dev/sdc /ssd
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc,
>          missing codepage or helper program, or other error
>          In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
>          dmesg | tail  or so
>
> # tail /var/log/messages
> ...
> Oct 22 23:54:36 svfis-dl180b kernel: EXT4-fs (sdc): bad block size 8192
>
> ok, so lets try 4K blocks?
>
> # mkfs.ext4 -b 4096 /dev/sdc
> mke2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
> /dev/sdc is entire device, not just one partition!
> Proceed anyway? (y,n) y
> mkfs.ext4: Invalid argument while setting blocksize; too small for device
>
>
>
> hmmm.   can't do that either?
>
> can I configure this 64bit system for large pages or something so it
> will support 8K blocks?
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux