On 10/21/11 10:25 AM, "Johnny Hughes" <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/21/2011 12:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>> They have created an optional channel in several of those groupings that >>> is only accessible via RHN and they do not put those RPMS on any ISOs >>> ... and they have completely changed their "Authorized Use Policy" so >>> that we can NOT login to RHN and use anything that is not on a public >>> FTP server or on an ISO set ... effectively cutting us off from the >>> ability to check anything on the optional channel. >> >> I've never quite understood how anything containing any GPL-covered >> code could have any redistribution/use restrictions added. >> > Trust me ... the Linux Foundation thinks it is OK, so we are SOL. I'd rather get the opinion of the FSF (those whom wrote the license) instead of LF, as they don't matter as much, really. -- Gary L. Greene, Jr. Sr. Systems Administrator IT Operations, Minerva Networks Inc. Cell: (650) 704-6633
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
