Re: What happened to 6.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 10/21/11 10:20 AM, "Les Mikesell" <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>> They have created an optional channel in several of those groupings that
>> is only accessible via RHN and they do not put those RPMS on any ISOs
>> ... and they have completely changed their "Authorized Use Policy" so
>> that we can NOT login to RHN and use anything that is not on a public
>> FTP server or on an ISO set ... effectively cutting us off from the
>> ability to check anything on the optional channel.
> 
> I've never quite understood how anything containing any GPL-covered
> code could have any redistribution/use restrictions added.

Agreed. Being that the GPL is more a distribution license than a use
license, the legality of what RH is saying here is a little questionable.
I'd honestly bring this up to the FSF for a clarification point.

-- 
Gary L. Greene, Jr.
Sr. Systems Administrator
IT Operations, Minerva Networks Inc.
Cell: (650) 704-6633
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux