On 10/10/11 9:39 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > It looks like I am also having trouble with rsh on C6 ... rsh was deprecated 10+ years ago, along with all the other r things... they aren't even remotely secure and using them is sloppy practice, even on a private network. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Odd issue with C6 and rsh
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Odd issue with C6 and rsh
- From: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:59:55 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1302677658.1458511.1318307982734.JavaMail.root@jaguar10.sfu.ca>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Odd issue with C6 and rsh
- From: James A. Peltier
- Re: Odd issue with C6 and rsh
- References:
- Re: Odd issue with C6 and rsh
- From: James A. Peltier
- Re: Odd issue with C6 and rsh
- Prev by Date: Re: RHEL 5.2 beta relased
- Next by Date: Re: Odd issue with C6 and rsh
- Previous by thread: Re: Odd issue with C6 and rsh
- Next by thread: Re: Odd issue with C6 and rsh
- Index(es):
 |