Re: Odd issue with C6 and NIS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Steve Rikli wrote:

> Why?  I'll grant NIS is insecure at best for login auth, and should not
> be used for that purpose (at least not outside the lab).
>
> But for other purposes e.g. automount maps, NIS is simple and easy and
> still functional.
>
> I'll also readily agree I wouldn't want NIS on internet-facing systems,
> but for things like automount maps on the internal corporate LAN, is
> it really a catastropic problem?

The problem you get is when you compare it with LDAP.

jh
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux