Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:16 PM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> It was - the docs for the version that was around in early '09 *said* >>>> that the latest release was based on RHEL 3. >>> >>> You are supposed to be able to download the open source components >>> here: >>> http://downloads.vmware.com/d/info/datacenter_cloud_infrastructure/vmware_vsphere/5_0#open_source >>> but all I see is a license file - that does mention the 2.6 kernel and >>> drivers. >> >> Yeah, well, the RHEL stuff I assume is released; their own heavy >> enhancements, I don't know. > > It doesn't matter if someone else released source. Anyone > distributing binaries containing GPL code is supposed to also supply > the matching source along with anything else that becomes part of a > derived work. IIRC, I don't *think* that if you take it and enhance it, you're required to release your commercial enhancements. For example, video drivers, proprietary. mark _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos