On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Negative <negativebinomial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:41 AM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Brian Mathis wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Negative <negativebinomial@xxxxxxxxx> >> > wrote: >> >> I built guest vm's one for Windows 7 and one for Windows XP using the >> >> virtual machine manager on a  just updated to centos 5.7, and they are >> >> both crashing the host machine. They run only  for a few minutes, but >> >> suddenly freeze, crashing the host.  There is no networking. No X. No >> >> way to drop out of X. The only way out is a hard reboot. I don't see >> >> anything in the logs -- messages or libvirt logs -- immediately before >> >> the crash. >> <snip> >> > Is this new hardware? Have you run any hardware burn testing (CPU, >> > RAM, etc...) and/or memtest86+ on the RAM? This sounds like a >> > hardware issue to me. > > It's about three years old. I had one hardware issue a year ago in which a > video card fried, but it's been great. I will run memtest this afternoon. > >> I agree with Brian - it may be coincidental that you built the VMs, and >> then it started crashing. >> > I should run memtest. I don't know of a tool to check the processors. I use > the machine for analyzing data, and often use most of the 32 gigs of memory > in it, but I doubt I've ever seriously stressed the processors. > > I created the two guests with the gui, but since they crash, I started one > without starting X on the host, using virsh. The guest and host both stay > up. When starting using virsh with the --console switch I get what looks > like a telnet connection. But I know almost nothing about Windows and don't > know what to look at. Networking between the guest and host might be borked > -- and that would've been my fault. Then, every time X is running the guest > and host crash. >> >> One other question: is selinux enabled? >> > > Yes. No warnings, though. >> >> mark It should not matter what the guest is, so Windows or Linux it shouldn't be crashing. If not hardware, it points to a bug in the hypervisor software. -☙ Brian Mathis ❧- _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos