On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:17 PM, John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/23/11 12:33 PM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Paras pradhan wrote:
>>> > Here is o/p John
>>> >
>>> > Number Start End Size File system Name
>>> > Flags
>>> > 1 17.4kB 134MB 134MB Microsoft reserved
>>> > partition msftres
>>> > 2 135MB 134GB 134GB ntfs Basic data partition
>>> > 3 134GB 1100GB 965GB Basic data partition
>> <snip>
>> Looks to me as though someone started to install Windows on top of your
>> box. This isn't partition data magically changed - best guess is someone
>> started, then stopped, realizing it was the wrong box they were working
>> on.
>
> ay-yup, thats EXACTLY what it looks like. a NEWER version of Windows
> at that.
>
You mean the newer windows will create the partition schema as we are
seeing it now? And you think its the automatic partitioning by windows
if somebody has the access to this?
Thanks
Paras.
> Weird how they got disk sde and not sda but I've seen Windows having a
> completely different idea of which device was '0' than Linux before...
>
>
>
> --
> john r pierce N 37, W 122
> santa cruz ca mid-left coast
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
