Re: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1245.html - CentOS 6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 09/23/2011 04:30 PM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>
>> What are you trying to say?
>> Karanbirs response is three weeks old and AFAICS the 6.0/cr repo is still
>> empty on the mirrors so there is no package for that problem available.
>>
>> If there are problems getting 6.0/cr going then fine but in that case fixes
>> for such dangerous bugs should be made available in some other way for
>> example by uploading a package to some temporary location until things are
>> working as they should.
>
> Yes it'd be nice.
>
> Until then, you can always grab the redhat srpm, or get a binary rpm from SL.

Still the fact that centos is leaving its users exposed to this kind of 
thing is...problematic. What's even more perplexing is that according the 
Karanbir the package was ready to go yet since then there is a sudden radio 
silence for three weeks. If there are still problems with building the 
updates ok but then they could have at least pushed this package out or put 
it on some server for people to download manually and if that is a problem 
too then they should have put out a message the next day that there are 
still problems and that people are better off building the updated package 
themselves.
At least that would have given the users some information to act on.

Regards,
   Dennis
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux