In article <b0189c04b5d9a25bd50d4ceacf479b79.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> John Hodrien wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 05:16 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> >>
> >>> Gmagic/Imagick are somewhat incapable of doing graphing at all.
> >>
> >> Have you ever really looked ? What about GmagickDraw::point and similar
> >> items ?
> >
> > I think the risk of the KISS approach is that you tend to reimplement
> > everything, because everything everyone else has done is overcomplicated.
>
> The "danger" of KISS approach? So, you endorse complex and complicated
> schemes? And here I thought that the True Believers in OO asserted that
> OOP was cleaner, simpler, and easier.
As Einstein said once: "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler."
More to the point would be: "Judging something *solely* on its simplicity
is an overly simplistic approach." -- Kiel Hodges. This appears to me
to be the trap that Paul Always Learning has fallen into.
Cheers
Tony
--
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - http://tony.mountifield.org
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
