On 09/13/11 9:40 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:24:48PM -0700, James A. Peltier wrote: >> > Any reason why 5 is not a symlink to 5.7 whereas 4 is a symlink to >> > 4.8? Looks like the same applies to 6!?! > Because the contents of 5/ are symlinks to the 5.7/ directories!?! yeah I noticed that they've changed that. in 4.x, cd centos; ln -s 4 4.8 but in 5.x+, its more like, cd centos/5.7 for i in *; do ln $i ../5/$i; done -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos