Re: managing a rack full of centos servers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I'm managing two data centers and some instances on rackspace cloud servers.  Currently running Cobbler+Puppet+Mcollective.  So far it's been great for a team of one, myself.  

At the moment I'm looking into either using Aeolus or Openstack to bridge the gap of my data centers and the public cloud still keeping Puppet+Mcollective in the mix and seeing if Cobbler is still needed.

Anyone out there tried both Aeolus *and* Openstack yet?  I'm looking to supplement my research on these two private/public cloud tools. =)

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Marian Marinov <mm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thursday 21 July 2011 18:36:17 Devin Reade wrote:
> --On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 11:02:42 PM -0700 RC <cooleyr@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:07:06 -0600 Devin Reade <gdr@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> It should be considered as complementing the automated config
> >> management tools like cfengine et al, not as a replacement for
> >> them (they're doing different jobs).
> >
> > That's not entirely fair.  A little shell scripting and pdsh and pdcp
> > can certainly do everything cfengine/puppet can do
>
> I wasn't referring to pdsh/pdcp; I was referring to pconsole.  The
> reason I said complementing is that sometimes it is good to have
> stuff under a configuration management system like cfengine/puppet,
> but sometimes you need to run ad-hoc commands, in an identical
> fashion, on lots of similar machines, which pconsole is good at
> (subject to the caveats I previously mentioned).
>
> I made no comments on pdsh/pdcp at all, and make no claims on where
> it fits in the spectrum.
>
> Devin
>
You can actually achieve the same functionality of pdsh/pdcp and pconsole with
a quite simple bash script :)

 http://multy-command.sourceforge.net/

I think it is a matter of what the admin will prefer to do. When you have a
lot of identical machines, sometimes it is better to have cfengine/puppet, but
sometimes it just an overkill to use them if you are the only one
administrating those machines.

cfengine and puppet have a very good place on machines that are administered
by a team of people.

But solutions like pdsh/pconsole and multy-command, in my opinion are more
suitable when there are only one or two guys administering those machines.


Marian

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




--

james h nguyen |
 lead systems architect | www.callfire.com | 1.949.625.4263

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux