On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 01:33:31 PM Always Learning wrote: > Rather than being a willing or passive victim to 100% of the attacks, I > aim to reduce the penetrability of most of them. Getting the last 10% will cost you 90% of your time. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Centos VPS Kernel 2.6.35.4 & 'string-less' IP tables
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Centos VPS Kernel 2.6.35.4 & 'string-less' IP tables
- From: Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:55:51 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1314812011.4402.140.camel@m6.u226.com>
- Organization: PARI
- User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.35.14-95.fc14.x86_64; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; )
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Centos VPS Kernel 2.6.35.4 & 'string-less' IP tables
- From: Always Learning
- Re: Centos VPS Kernel 2.6.35.4 & 'string-less' IP tables
- References:
- Centos VPS Kernel 2.6.35.4 & 'string-less' IP tables
- From: Always Learning
- Re: Centos VPS Kernel 2.6.35.4 & 'string-less' IP tables
- From: Always Learning
- Centos VPS Kernel 2.6.35.4 & 'string-less' IP tables
- Prev by Date: Re: Question re: CentOS-6.0, KVM, and /dev/sr0
- Next by Date: Re: Centos VPS Kernel 2.6.35.4 & 'string-less' IP tables
- Previous by thread: Re: Centos VPS Kernel 2.6.35.4 & 'string-less' IP tables
- Next by thread: Re: Centos VPS Kernel 2.6.35.4 & 'string-less' IP tables
- Index(es):
 |