On 08/25/2011 09:18 AM, ken wrote:
I agree.On 08/25/2011 08:47 AM Timothy Murphy wrote:I don't think that is necessary; this newsgroup does not seem to me to be over-loaded with OT material, or indeed with material of any kind. Splitting it would just be a nuisance, in my case at least. Surely it is easy enough to avoid reading an article labelled OT?I agree. There isn't that much OT stuff here in the first place. And it's really not that hard to hit the delete key if you don't want to see it. If there's going to be an OT list, why not also have a list for Stuff That Doesn't Answer the OP's Question and another for Discussions Gone Off on an Irrelevant Tangent... and another list: Threads I'm Not Interested In. :) I use Thunderbird and all I do is press 't' and it marks the thread read and goes the next thread. --
Stephen Clark NetWolves Sr. Software Engineer III Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netwolves.com |
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
