centos 3.5 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Ahh that I did not know.. it was 4.1 i was after, but i'll be happy to
wait it out no problemo.

On 5/11/05, Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 08:54 -0400, Beau Henderson wrote:
> > Cool yep works :)
> >
> > Sorry to hijack the thread, but would it be unwise of me to grab these
> > ISO's and and build my own ( even public ) repo to update my current
> > setup via yum ? I'm guessing the reason this isn't currently an option
> > is availability of diskspace ?
> 
> Are you talking 4.1 or 3.5 :)
> 
> For 4.1, we have an internally tested alpha that works, but I didn't
> want to release it until RH releases the SRPMS publicly :)
> 
> For 3.5 You can just point the [base] for the machines you want to
> update to http://beta.centos.org/centos/3.5beta/os/i386/ in yum
> 
> 
> BodyID:516198353.2.n.logpart (stored separately)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Beau Henderson
http://www.ImInteractive.net

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux