On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 12:11:51 PM Peter Kjellström wrote: > On Friday, August 05, 2011 05:25:13 PM Les Mikesell wrote: > > On 8/5/2011 9:46 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote: > > > Our X520 are still stable except for one recent problem, 2.6.18-238.9.1 > > > -> 2.6.18-238.12.1 broke it quite bad. With 238.12.1 our servers start > > > dropping all incomming packets after a while. Sanity can be > > > (temporarily restored with a "ethtool --negotiate ethX"). > > > > > > We are currently running a kernel that excludes: > > > linux-2.6-net-ixgbe-fix-for-82599-erratum-on-header-splitting.patch > > > > > > since that's what seems to break our setup. > > > > Has the bug been reported upstream? > > Nope, due to: 1) no reproducer and 2) the "next" EL kernel will have a new > major version of the driver code making it quite pointless to invest > effort/time in the 2.x driver. > > If more information surfaces (maybe in this thread) and/or the problem > persists with the 3.x driver then a bz will most likely be created. To follow up on this, we can not reproduce the problem with the 3.x driver as shipped with the 5.7 kernel. /Peter
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
