On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 12:42 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On May 11, 2005, at 12:39 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:00:51PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So there is no kernel-smp.ia32e (none also on PNAELV)
> >>
> >> Weird. Any idea why the UP processor reports SMP then?
> >
> > because the ia32e kernel is already SMP :P
> >
> > CONFIG_SMP=y in the kernel-2.4.21-ia32e.config
> > (cf /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-27.0.4.EL/configs from
> > kernel-source-2.4.21-27.0.4.EL)
> >
> > You shouldn't need the kernel-smp on EM64T.
>
> Someone needs to beat the Red Hat kernel packager with a clue stick.
>
> Thanks for your help, the new kernel works fine. :)
>
> --
You are not alone ... I screwed up my kernel too. {And I build this
stuff :)}
Their logic (silly as it is) is that there is no such thing as a non-SMP
kernel for ia32e (since it has hyperthreading) ... SO ... no need for an
ia32e SMP and non-SMP kernel. So, for a reason that I am not possibly
able to understand, they decided that the ia32e kernel would be compiled
with SMP and not be labeled as SMP.
go figure :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050511/e27f193e/attachment.bin
