On 08/02/11 12:41 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > I just do not understand why these obscure distribution 'gotchas' > are created in the first place, much less permitted to persist. you'd need to ask Red Hat that. Its their policy. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Two ftp clients? Why?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Two ftp clients? Why?
- From: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:57:42 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <60195.216.185.71.25.1312314112.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
- References:
- Two ftp clients? Why?
- From: James B. Byrne
- Two ftp clients? Why?
- Prev by Date: Re: CentOS 6.0 and freenx
- Next by Date: Re: Two ftp clients? Why?
- Previous by thread: Two ftp clients? Why?
- Next by thread: Re: Two ftp clients? Why?
- Index(es):
 |