On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Peter Peltonen
> <peter.peltonen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, John R. Dennison <jrd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:53:23AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
>>>>
>>>> i think i am not the only one who wants to stay with with xen :)
>>>
>>> Far from it. Xen still has a place as a dom0.
>>
>> What are the reasons for people staying with Xen as dom0, just the
>> learning curve? Or are there some technical considerations as well?
>
>
> KVM is not as mature as XEN. yet....? And if you want to use a so
> called Enterprise Operating System like CentOS, then you'd probably
> expect a stable and "enterprise" grade virtualization kernel as well.
>
> KVM, IMO (and others as well ) is not enterprise ready yet.
I'd edit what you've said in two ways.
1. The tools to manage KVM aren't as mature as the tools to manage Xen.
2. A so-called Enterprise Operating System like RHEL.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
