On 07/26/2011 05:43 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > (thought: could bad metadata cause an exploitable segfault?) > if you can create something like that - make sure you report it to the right places! - KB _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
- From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:45:10 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20110726164339.GA15450@mercury.spuddy.org>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
- References:
- yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
- From: Lars Hecking
- Re: yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
- From: Frank M. Ramaekers
- Re: yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
- From: Daniel Heitmann
- Re: yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
- From: Lars Hecking
- Re: yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
- From: Karanbir Singh
- Re: yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
- From: Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
- From: Karanbir Singh
- Re: yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
- From: Stephen Harris
- yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
- Prev by Date: Re: yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
- Next by Date: Re: yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
- Previous by thread: Re: yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
- Next by thread: Re: yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
- Index(es):
 |