On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > I was puzzled to not that the former of the two is an rpm of zero bytes. Why puzzled? I'm guessing it's just an empty RPM with a load of dependencies as a way of cleaning up the dependency chain. jh _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: nouveau driver one centos 6
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: nouveau driver one centos 6
- From: John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:07:10 +0100 (BST)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <fee725eb531dadfe5ba94219eca65124.squirrel@mail.5-cent.us>
- User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: nouveau driver one centos 6
- From: m . roth
- Re: nouveau driver one centos 6
- References:
- nouveau driver one centos 6
- From: Jerry Geis
- Re: nouveau driver one centos 6
- From: m . roth
- nouveau driver one centos 6
- Prev by Date: Re: nouveau driver one centos 6
- Next by Date: Re: OT: [opensuse-offtopic] Microsoft struggles to get Hyper-V drivers in Linux kernel (fwd)
- Previous by thread: Re: nouveau driver one centos 6
- Next by thread: Re: nouveau driver one centos 6
- Index(es):
 |