Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> as a rule, you should declare ALL subnets in simple form:
>
> subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { }
>
> so ISC DHCP knows about them. Why, I do not know, but it is supposed to
> be in newer versions (more strict rules for config file.)
Thanks for your response.
As far as I can see, my dhcpd.conf satisfies these conditions.
But what puzzles me is, what defines the correspondence
between interface and network,
eg in my case eth1 -> 192.168.2.0/24
Surely this should be there independently of dhcpd ?
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
