Re: CentOS 6 system-config-bind missing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 7/13/11 12:07 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 07/12/11 9:50 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> It is easy enough to build the forward zones (except for verifying that your MX
>> and CNAME entries don't reference other CNAMES), but painful to do the reverse
>> ones.  Is there a simple packaged script to do a sanity/syntax check and make
>> the reverse zone files for you?
>
> the ones I've seen have been woefully inadequate.   many of my domains
> stretch across multiple IP providers, not all of whom I have RDNS on
> anyways.

You can still get control delegated to you although it is somewhat ugly if the 
range doesn't hit class C boundaries.

> re: cname's, I'm of the opinion that you shouldn't use CNAME within your
> own domain(s), and only use them if you can't possibly use anything
> else...  About the ONLY place I use them is things like aiming a host at
> something like google where you HAVE to use a CNAME.

We disagree then.  I think you should rarely give out anything but CNAMEs tied 
to services unless you only run one service per address because otherwise you 
can't split them apart later.  It just becomes messy when your zones are managed 
by different people and the targets of CNAMEs later are converted to CNAMEs 
themselves.  You aren't supposed to do that, but it is common enough that 
everything follows them anyway.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux