Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>Should I assume that these .iso's are unreliable, and d/l
>>newer ones?
>
> No, normal behavior.
Ok, now you have me confused: should there not be such image files?
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: CentOS 6 and pxeboot
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: CentOS 6 and pxeboot
- From: m.roth@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:04:19 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <assp.0174792948.92097A6A775D5147B1078E3F15430B92889600@prato.activenetwerx.local>
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CentOS 6 and pxeboot
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: CentOS 6 and pxeboot
- References:
- Re: CentOS 6 and pxeboot
- From: m . roth
- Re: CentOS 6 and pxeboot
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: CentOS 6 and pxeboot
- Prev by Date: Re: Repositories for CentOS 6
- Next by Date: Re: Repositories for CentOS 6
- Previous by thread: Re: CentOS 6 and pxeboot
- Next by thread: Re: CentOS 6 and pxeboot
- Index(es):
 |