On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Eric Viseur <eric.viseur@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > CentOS has the complete RHEL binary compatibility, which SL doesn't always > have. Can be a decisive thing, sometimes. Just to be more precise ... No clones (including CentOS) have *complete* RHEL binary compatibility. Both CenOS and SL *aim* to be 100% binary compatible. Akemi _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Switch from SL -> Centos
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Switch from SL -> Centos
- From: Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 05:16:07 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CANe+hiMxGD+7q2Pcu+wXq+67NezJUdVC2T76PaG04v9rVhD2Nw@mail.gmail.com>
- References:
- Switch from SL -> Centos
- From: Nicolas Ross
- Re: Switch from SL -> Centos
- From: James Hogarth
- Re: Switch from SL -> Centos
- From: 夜神 岩男
- Re: Switch from SL -> Centos
- From: Eric Viseur
- Switch from SL -> Centos
- Prev by Date: Re: CentOS 6 system-config-network missing
- Next by Date: Re: Suggest Hardware Raid Controller Card
- Previous by thread: Re: Switch from SL -> Centos
- Next by thread: Re: Switch from SL -> Centos
- Index(es):
 |