On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:00:03AM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > > Neah. I am talking on how those free AV's are not worth the time spent > in installing them. Only heavy-hitters like KIS (KAV not so much) > Symantec NIS and one or two others are capable to stop really nasty bug > taking over. Even heavy-hitters any at risk if they have idiot > controlling them. Symantec is garbage and has been for many years. Don't care for Kaspersky from past use, but that was indeed KAV as I've not used anything else from them. Perhaps I should evaluate their KIS offering. I've had absolutely no trouble whatsoever with Avast other than on my own personal desktop and that was strictly caused by my usage patterns and would not affect "normal" users in any way; I recommend and install avast on not only on family and friends boxes but on clients as well. John -- The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much, it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945), 32nd President of the United States, second inaugural address, 20 January 1937
Attachment:
pgpqNaAzeIJ3s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
