B.J. McClure wrote: > Here is my setup which includes a few packages from rpmforge. Same > setup on a dozen desktops with various hardware. All play mp3. > > ~]$ rpm -qa | grep gstreamer > gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.11-1.el6.rf.x86_64 > phonon-backend-gstreamer-4.6.2-17.el6.x86_64 > gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.19-2.el6.x86_64 > gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.16-2.el6.rf.x86_64 > gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras-0.10.19-2.el6.x86_64 > gstreamer-python-0.10.16-1.1.el6.x86_64 > PackageKit-gstreamer-plugin-0.5.8-13.el6.x86_64 > gstreamer-tools-0.10.29-1.el6.x86_64 > gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.23-1.el6.x86_64 > gstreamer-0.10.29-1.el6.x86_64 > gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.19-3.el6.rf.x86_64 > gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.29-1.el6.x86_64 > [bmcclure@house ~]$ > RPMForge is not "the base/official repo", and you are using -ugly- package for MP3
Gee, I think I mentioned that in the first line of my post.
Quote: "GStreamer Ugly Plug-ins is a set of plug-ins that have good quality and correct functionality, but distributing them might pose problems. The license on either the plug-ins or the supporting libraries might not be how we'd like. The code might be widely known to present patent problems."
Most everyone is aware of that, however, there is a legal distinction between "using" and "distributing", at least where I live.Cheers,
B.J.
Ljubomir _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
| RHEL 6.0, Linux 2.6.32-131.2.1.el6.x86_64 |
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
