On Friday, July 01, 2011 05:52:51 AM Fajar Priyanto wrote: > Google comes to my knowledge that 1.1.1.1 is not a private IP anymore? > Since when? 1.1.1.1 has never been an RFC1918 'private' address. Applications that treat it as such are broken. RFC1918 ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1918 ) only list three address blocks for private use: 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, and 192.168.0.0/16 All other blocks are either reserved or are allocated (at this point, at least). _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: OT: 1.1.1.1 is not private anymore?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: OT: 1.1.1.1 is not private anymore?
- From: Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 10:05:30 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTi=qmMpNhyRrxyYmJQDUUkHyJOPXOA@mail.gmail.com>
- Organization: PARI
- User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.35.13-92.fc14.x86_64; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; )
- References:
- OT: 1.1.1.1 is not private anymore?
- From: Fajar Priyanto
- OT: 1.1.1.1 is not private anymore?
- Prev by Date: Re: Power-outage
- Next by Date: Re: Power-outage
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: 1.1.1.1 is not private anymore?
- Next by thread: Power-outage
- Index(es):
 |