On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 04:43:09 PM Rainer Duffner wrote: > Virtualization is an option, but the trouble is: if the server is I/O- > constrained anyway, virtualization won't help. > Everything will just be even slower. That depends. More expensive servers that would be suitable for virtualization host use also tend to have better I/O subsystems and faster disks. Relative to a 'cheap' system with much poorer base I/O bandwidth. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Anyway to ensure SSH availability?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Anyway to ensure SSH availability?
- From: Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:17:35 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <6C312488-1854-42B4-B90D-92C3D9DDDA42@ultra-secure.de>
- Organization: PARI
- User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.35.13-92.fc14.x86_64; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; )
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Anyway to ensure SSH availability?
- From: Rainer Duffner
- Re: Anyway to ensure SSH availability?
- References:
- Anyway to ensure SSH availability?
- From: Emmanuel Noobadmin
- Re: Anyway to ensure SSH availability?
- From: Rainer Duffner
- Anyway to ensure SSH availability?
- Prev by Date: Re: Anyway to ensure SSH availability?
- Next by Date: Re: Anyway to ensure SSH availability?
- Previous by thread: Re: Anyway to ensure SSH availability?
- Next by thread: Re: Anyway to ensure SSH availability?
- Index(es):
 |