Re: CentOS-6 Status updates

[Ljubomir Ljubojevic <office@xxxxxxxx>]

Mark Bradbury wrote:
> 
>     yes cool isn't it, that webpage is updated! actually that's what makes
>     it useful.
>     besides, read the title text on that page again:
>     "QA dates are tentative dates for internal planning only. These are not
>     official release dates, but only a guide for the QA team. All target
>     dates are subject to change."
> 
> 
> Which makes it pretty useless. 
> 

Not quite. Those are at least "not before this date". And those are 
goals set for upcoming period. If issues are found between now and then, 
then schedule has to be moved. They are not Microsoft to release 
unfinished product.

But I do think that some kind of announcement that target date 
might/will not be met should be posted 1-2 days prior to that date. That 
would make speculations at lowest minimum possible.

Ljubomir
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos