On 06/25/2011 01:13 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > The results were unexpected. The higher the MTU on the sending NIC, > the lower the file transfer speed. What kind of switch are you using? If your switches don't support large packets, you'll also see slowdowns like that. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Jumbo Frame performance or lackof?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Jumbo Frame performance or lackof?
- From: Gordon Messmer <yinyang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:10:51 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTinPS9fwA5Ojd++ng=VZgMm0jQPKHg@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Thunderbird/3.1.10
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Jumbo Frame performance or lackof?
- From: Emmanuel Noobadmin
- Re: Jumbo Frame performance or lackof?
- References:
- Jumbo Frame performance or lackof?
- From: Emmanuel Noobadmin
- Jumbo Frame performance or lackof?
- Prev by Date: Re: sendmail - smtp security/authentication & port 587 issues
- Next by Date: Re: sendmail - smtp security/authentication & port 587 issues
- Previous by thread: Re: Jumbo Frame performance or lackof?
- Next by thread: Re: Jumbo Frame performance or lackof?
- Index(es):
 |