On 06/15/2011 05:52 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Drawback is that such KVM guest is not as easy to move to another host > if current host can not boot. Copying image and config files will be > much faster. There is no reason that should be true. Copying 20GB out of an LV should take exactly the same amount of time as copying 20GB out of a file. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Slightly OT: First Time KVM and LVM on Centos
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Slightly OT: First Time KVM and LVM on Centos
- From: Gordon Messmer <yinyang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:56:24 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4DF953C2.6020107@xxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slightly OT: First Time KVM and LVM on Centos
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Slightly OT: First Time KVM and LVM on Centos
- References:
- Slightly OT: First Time KVM and LVM on Centos
- From: Jeff Boyce
- Re: Slightly OT: First Time KVM and LVM on Centos
- From: Gordon Messmer
- Re: Slightly OT: First Time KVM and LVM on Centos
- From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic
- Slightly OT: First Time KVM and LVM on Centos
- Prev by Date: Re: Odd issue with custom udev rule at boot
- Next by Date: Re: Possible to use multiple disk to bypass I/O wait?
- Previous by thread: Re: Slightly OT: First Time KVM and LVM on Centos
- Next by thread: Re: Slightly OT: First Time KVM and LVM on Centos
- Index(es):
 |