Re: CentOS-6 Status updates

[Craig White <craigwhite@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 08:52 -0700, Jerry Franz wrote:
> On 06/14/2011 08:41 AM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, but some people appear to think (or at least that was what I got
> > from the post of the guy I was replying to) that fedora is good enough for
> > production.
> 
> *blink*
> 
> Absolutely not. I was talking about Ubuntu Server LTS. I don't use 
> Fedora for *anything*. I gave up on it back around FC5.
> 
> Ubuntu Server LTS is *very* suitable for production use.
----
Like RHEL/CentOS, Ubuntu LTS is absolutely appropriate for server use.
In fact, it's sort of refreshing to set up a new server that isn't
overloaded with bloat from the very start. Setting up a new VMWare image
w/ Ubuntu Server takes at most 10 minutes whereas doing the same w/
CentOS 5 takes almost an hour (easier just to clone my base install copy
kept for just that purpose).

I actually use Fedora for my Desktop. It dual boots to Ubuntu but I
don't often use it. The only reason that I ever saw people using Fedora
for production was because the RHEL/CentOS software packages were so
completely out-of-date.

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos