Re: CentOS-6 Status updates

[Christopher Chan <christopher.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 11:26 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
>> heck it's still Linux and pretty much the same.
>
> There's a lot more than just a kernel to break a system.
>
>> Red Hat went far too long between releases and it is clear to me that I can't
>> possibly rely on CentOS for timeliness.
>
> Maybe I'm just in a different kind of environment, but why do you *need* more frequent releases?  I still run some servers on EL 4 and will only migrate them when they approach End-of-Life status.  They work and are up unless I bring them down.  Security patches are still being pushed out for them.  Sounds like you're looking for a desktop linux - probably best to use Fedora/Ubuntu?
>

/me hazards a guess...php?
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos