Well, I thought they had an unsupported dir for that. OTOH, since CentOS isn't really supported could we maybe turn reiserfs on in the centos kernel builds? If you want heavy-duty support you're not going for CentOS anyway... And it's a tad easier to make the few changes to the .config before the build system then it is to compile the module from source at home (which is effectively forcing a full kernel compile on me on a Celeron 366)... (although the reiserfs module is 2 MB's or so... so it could also be a matter of space...) It would probably be best to make a kernel-module-reiserfs package and stick in extras/centosplus or somewhere... except I don't really know how to go about doing that :) Well anyway, if anyone wants a reiserfs module for CentOS 4, I'll have it built by the end of today... Cheers, MaZe. On Tue, 3 May 2005, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2005 at 1:15pm, Maciej Zenczykowski wrote > > > I basically need reiserfs3 (nb. why is it disabled? it's a module, you > > use it, it doesn't wreck anything...) and I don't really want to change > > the rest of the kernel, and I'd like to have the minimum amount of fuss on > > future kernel upgrades. > > Not answering the main question, but I would guess that this module is > disabled for the same reason that XFS is -- support. Anything Red Hat > distributes in RHEL they must support at a high level. They decided not > to spend resources supporting XFS, and it looks like reiserfs is in the > same boat. > > -- > Joshua Baker-LePain > Department of Biomedical Engineering > Duke University > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >