Re: what is difference between "slow initialize" and "patrol read" on RAID?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



> On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 09:00:48 PM mcclnx mcc wrote:
>> We have DELL server with MD1000 Disk array in it.  O.S. is CENTOS 5.5.
>> Recently every time MD1000 "patrol read" start I will get "media error"
>> messages on /var/log/message file.
>>
>> I use MD1000 "slow initialize" to initialize "bad disk" and NO error.
>> After "slow initialize" finish, I manually "startup patrol read".  I
>> continue get "media error" on /var/log/message.
>>
>> Anyone know what difference between "slow initialize" and "patrol read"?
>
> Only Dell really knows what they mean by it.
>
> But here are some random thoughts:
>
>  * Slow init may write all of the disk during init but maybe:
>   1) no errors happen during write
>   2) it notices an error but retries silently
>   3) it notices an error but has sucky error reporting

Yes, both can be true. I guess it's simply because a disk which writes on
a bad sector/block just silently remaps it and goes on because it's
considered fixed.

>  * Patrolread (may) compare parity data and report this as "media error"
>    (a type of error slow init probably wouldn't detect)
>  * The I/O pattern of patrolread compared to slow init provoks an error

I always tought patrolread just tries to read the whole disk to detect
sleeping bad sectors/blocks. Maybe it also checks consistency on the RAID
level but I'm not sure.

Simon


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux