On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 15:35 -0800, Joe Harb wrote:
> Even the RHEL4 release notes claim gnumeric in now included. Has
> anyone checked to see if it is there?
>
gnumeric was removed by RedHat in RHEL4 (although it was in RHEL4-
Beta2) ... it is therefore removed in CentOS-4.
I have checked the RPMS and SRPMS in RHEL4 ... it is not there
Whether they did it on purpose or by accident I don't know. We removed
it on purpose in CentOS-4 to mirror what was done in RHEL4.
> Greg Knaddison wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:16:37 -0800, Joe Harb <joe-harb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > The release notes state that gnumeric has been included in this
> > > distribution. Was it forgotten?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I followed the same steps that I followed here:
> >
> > http://lists.caosity.org/pipermail/centos/2005-March/003886.html
> >
> > And didn't find it in the RH SRPMs.
> >
> > They seem to have forgotten it.
> >
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2005-February/msg00001.html
> >
> > On purpose...
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128829
> >
> > It's odd that it's in the stupid release notes, but not in the release.
> >
> > Greg
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
Johnny Hughes
<http://www.HughesJR.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050331/1cba5164/attachment.bin
