Steven Crothers wrote: > opens community development. Having one developer doing all the > packaging (Johnny) is a waste of resources and intelligence. A simple oh no! please don't anybody reply, despite gross inaccuracies such as that quoted above, and turn this into another 100-post flamewar... pretty please? _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Initial 6.0 trees in QA
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Initial 6.0 trees in QA
- From: Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 21:09:00 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTim-_ZHAVEz_WthpQAL9w23wdoojqg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailscanner-null-check: 1307041740.32792@Ca4DZx4bzyqwa3P2iSDPMw
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110509 SeaMonkey/2.0.14
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Initial 6.0 trees in QA
- From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic
- Re: Initial 6.0 trees in QA
- References:
- Initial 6.0 trees in QA
- From: Paul Heinlein
- Re: Initial 6.0 trees in QA
- From: Mark Bradbury
- Re: Initial 6.0 trees in QA
- From: Drew
- Re: Initial 6.0 trees in QA
- From: Steven Crothers
- Re: Initial 6.0 trees in QA
- From: aurfalien
- Re: Initial 6.0 trees in QA
- From: Steven Crothers
- Initial 6.0 trees in QA
- Prev by Date: Re: Initial 6.0 trees in QA
- Next by Date: Re: calendar
- Previous by thread: Re: Initial 6.0 trees in QA
- Next by thread: Re: Initial 6.0 trees in QA
- Index(es):
 |