Re: OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Gordon Messmer wrote:
> I've never seen the developer suggest that releases are longer because 
> they don't remember how the last one was finished.

Where on earth did you dig this out? I said they **could** be faster 
since it is all fresh in their memory. I was explaining what conclusion 
made me say my *estimate* of *possible* time frame and you draw devs 
into this and make strange claims not directly connected to what I was 
saying.

> 
> The point that Dag and I were trying to make, I think, was simply that 
> your expectations are unrealistic.

NO. Entire thread was derailed long before my e-mail, and flame-war only 
used my "expectation" (I would say an guessed estimate) as a jumping 
point for it's own claims, just touching my e-mail when otherwise insane 
rhetoric was depleted and you (meaning **all** participants of that 
insanity, on both sides) needed more ammunition.

And No, I will not reply anymore to this topic, whatever is said. I have 
  much more pressing things to do then discuss about semantics.

Ljubomir
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux