Re: SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sun, 22 May 2011, yonatan pingle wrote:

To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: yonatan pingle <yonatan.pingle@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re:  SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Steven Crothers
<steven.crothers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was running on 3gbps sata bus, and the  performance was great, it
just dies in one big crash without  giving any clues about it.

If only SSD's were a viable solution for long-term storage, we could
theoretically increase our virtualization many times over. It's to bad
the technology hasn't come far enough to be used that way though
without costing an arm and leg.

But it's going in the right direction now.

--
Steven Crothers
steven.crothers@xxxxxxxxx


the only way to go with SSD is RAID due to these reasons.
it's unlikely that two disks will die at the same time, so it's
possible to use and enjoy them ,
but don't forget to have a fresh backup and a raid array. ( that
should be done also with an ordinary disk array anyways ).

That's EXACTLY what I was thinking. Two 40GB SSD drives in a RAID array would not cost much at all. Move all the disk intensive stuff to that. I only have two root partitions of 20GB each for my main install - everything else is on other partitions on 2 x 500GB E-IDE drives. So putting the root partion on a small SSD (possibly RAIDed) is another option. Like most new electronics components, as time passes the mass production cost fall dramatically, and the technology improves. Look at the way HDD technology continues to advance.

Maybe in 5 years time the cost of SSD's will be alot cheaper? Possibly in another 15 years time HDD's with moving parts will be consigned to history and science museums? I'm watching this technology very closely, and I'm very tempted to buy a small 40GB SSD like OWC's.

They keep performing at optimal speed according to the specs for that drive.

The OWC SSD's are supposed to have a MTTF of 2 million hours, PLUS they do not degrade over time. So if an OWC keeps going until MTTF, that's 24 x 365 = 8760 HPY. 2000000 / 8760 = 228.31 years MTTF ?

So why does it only have a 3 year warranty? - LOL

For me anything on SWAP has to be better than a s/h drive thats had almost a years running time according to the SMART data on the drive:

9 Power_On_Hours  0x0032   090   090   000
  Old_age   Always       -       7913

329 days running time already - let's see how long this one lasts before it kicks the bucket.

Kind Regards,

Keith Roberts

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Websites:
http://www.karsites.net
http://www.php-debuggers.net
http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk

All email addresses are challenge-response protected with
TMDA [http://tmda.net]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux