Les wrote: > Everyone expected this from Red Hat before the 'EL' versions > when publishing a free CD of community work was the way QA > was done. (And if you've forgotten, go dig through some > changelogs of that era to see just how bad things were and > how much we gained from that process). But wasn't closing > the process and letting 'experts' do that before shipping > supposed to have improved things? > not really sure what you are saying Les... what are you saying? are you talking about Red Hat internal processes ? it is a very profitable publically traded corporate structure with employees and products... what dont you understand about that? - rh _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos